0 תגובות   יום שני, 9/8/10, 11:13

''
Aristotle seems
5:31
Starting to look more like what we think as a political
5:36
Scientist. He gathered constitutions,
5:39
158 of them all, from all over the Old
5:43
World. He was the first to give some
5:46
Kind of ideological rigidity on the vocabulary of political life.
5:51
Above all, Aristotle's works, like politics
5:55
Nicomachean Ethics, specifically designed
5:59
Teaching political work, political education.
6:03
They apparently planned to raise as philosophers
6:08
Potential philosophers than to shape and educate the citizens
6:14
Future politicians. Theoretical works seem less
6:18
In the sense of building abstract models of political
6:23
More life, giving advice, in the sense of the sun
6:28
A civil arbitrator's opinion and public disputes.
6:33
Unlike Socrates, who became famous in figure
6:36
Republic's seventh book, compared the political life
6:40
Cave, and unlike an apology which Socrates
6:44
Number of his fellow citizens that their lives,
6:47
That was investigated, is not worth living,
6:50
Aristotle takes seriously the dignity of the city showed
6:55
How the philosophy might be useful to citizens
6:59
Statesmen.
7:03
However, for all that, you could say that there are still
7:07
Deep mystery surrounding Aristotle's political works.
7:17
Simply put, you can simply ask
7:21
What were the politics of Aristotle's Politics?
7:26
What were the political views of Aristotle himself?
7:31

The best place to start is, of course, with views
13:17
As stated in the opening pages of the Politics
13:20
His reasoning here, however brief,
14:19
Worth following. Let me just quote him.
14:24
"This man," he says "is much more political animal than any
14:28
Type of bee or absence of life is clear.
"
14:32
Why is that clear? "We provide that," he says,
14:35
"Nature does nothing in vain, and man alone among animals
14:40
Have spoken.
14:45
In other species, "he says," can be cool,
14:50
May sound and be able to distinguish between pleasure and pain,
14:56
Speech "- his word is logos.
14:59
A man has a logo - a reason or speech.
15:01
The word can also be interpreted .-- "is more than just ability
15:05
To distinguish between pleasure and pain. "He continues.
15:08
"But the logo," he writes, "is used to reveal the
15:11
Benefit and harm. Therefore, "he writes,
15:15
"Only the right. For this strange man
15:19
Compared with other animals that he alone has a perception of
15:23
Good or bad, right is right and
15:26
Things. "In other words,
15:28
He seems to say that he talk or reason,
15:31
Logo, that is capable of
15:33
Differentiate and create a certain moral categories,
15:37
Certain categories of moral important that we live by -
15:41
Advantage, pests,
15:44
Just and unjust, and things like that
15:47
Are, as he says, a family and polis.
15:51

He says polis is by nature.
17:39
It's natural. The city is natural, because it
17:42
Enables people to achieve perfect what he calls their
17:47
telos. That is their end,
17:50
Their goal. We are political animals,
17:53
He says that participation in city life
17:57
Necessary to achieve human excellence,
18:00
For our well-being.
18:04
A man without a city, he says, who is
18:07
apolis - No City - should also be an animal or
18:11
Al. Ie,
18:13
Below or above humanity. Our political character of our
18:17
A necessary feature. That only by participating
18:21
Political life we have accomplished, we can purchase the excellences
18:25
Or degrees, as he says, it makes us what
18:29
We, for our telos or fill out our full
18:33
Completeness.
18:38

Aristotle believed in our social and political nature is not
23:02
The result of calculation, as we shall see Hobbs,
23:06
Locke, and other social contract theories,
23:10
But things like love, affection, friendship,
23:14
And sympathy are the grounds of political life rooted
23:20
Our icons. This allows speech
23:26
Sharing these features that make us fully human.
23:34
But to say, of course, that man is inherently political
23:37
Is not only to say that we become fully human by
23:40
Participating with others in the city.
23:42
That means more than that.
23:47
Form of association that leads to our perfection
23:52
Note the opening pages of the book, Aristotle did not
27:16
Says nothing about what kind of city or regime is the best.
27:22
All he tells us is that we live by the Police
27:26
Nature, that to achieve our ends, will be necessary
27:30
Polis life. But what type of Police?
27:33
How it should be subject? By one, few,
27:37
Many, or some combination of these three category?
27:43 I think that the regime
40:09
Nature, that is the best regime,
40:13
Will be what we may think of him as the aristocracy of
40:17
Educated aristocracy of the education and training,
40:22
Some aristocratic republic in which educated
40:27
Elite for the benefit of all states.
40:31
Aristotle's Republic, and I use this term to remind
40:37
Plato's and you are dedicated to fostering
40:42
High level of citizen virtue where it says these features
40:49
Mind and heart necessary for self-government.
40:54
These features, he believes,
40:56
They maintain the unity of the minority who can
41:00
Sharing in the administration of justice at
41:04
City.
41:10
It's probably a very elite teaching.
41:16
Would you agree? Attracts us,
41:19
Maybe that's why, contrary to our intuitions very
41:25
And the way we were taught.
41:28
Yes? You agree with me.
41:33
But before we dismiss Aristotle's account
41:38
inegalitarian unbearable elitist,
41:43
Difficult question we must ask not only of Aristotle,
41:48
But more important than our own.
41:55
What else Yale, but the Elite Institution
42:00
Designed to educate, morally and intellectually,
42:05
Potential members of the leadership class?
42:14
Think about it. Can anyone get mail?
42:19
Do we have an open admissions policy for all who want to com
Here? Hardly.
Does not require those qualities of self-control,
Discipline, restraint is essential to success
Here? I'll leave aside,
For a moment, what will happen on Friday
Saturday
Is it a coincidence that this alumni
Unlike a few others that find themselves
High positions of government, business,
Law, and academia? Is that fair or unreasonable
Describe it in class, like Aristotle, perhaps,
As a natural aristocracy? I leave you with this question
Think. Before we reject Aristotle

''
דרג את התוכן: